<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portrait vs. Kit: Which Lens is Better For You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/2009/10/08/portrait-vs-kit-which-lens-is-better-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/2009/10/08/portrait-vs-kit-which-lens-is-better-for-you/</link>
	<description>Food, Lifestyle, Newlywed Life and Crafts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/2009/10/08/portrait-vs-kit-which-lens-is-better-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4619</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/?p=4868#comment-4619</guid>
		<description>Octavian-I definitely have a preference for shooting portraits with my aperture set as wide as possible so I can&#039;t deny my bias. What you are referring to as &quot;bokeh&quot; is actually depth-of-field, the portion of a scene that appears sharp in the image. Bokeh is the way a lens renders out of focus light, and it&#039;s something you aren&#039;t seeing in the images above. 

Quality is definitely up to the individual shooter/viewer! If you think your kit lens can get you the quality you are looking for than more power to you. It&#039;s going to be cheaper for you in the long run :)
.-= Jenna&#039;s most recent blog post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThatWife/~3/akG4S3O6iTU/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Our Heavenly Family&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Octavian-I definitely have a preference for shooting portraits with my aperture set as wide as possible so I can&#8217;t deny my bias. What you are referring to as &#8220;bokeh&#8221; is actually depth-of-field, the portion of a scene that appears sharp in the image. Bokeh is the way a lens renders out of focus light, and it&#8217;s something you aren&#8217;t seeing in the images above. </p>
<p>Quality is definitely up to the individual shooter/viewer! If you think your kit lens can get you the quality you are looking for than more power to you. It&#8217;s going to be cheaper for you in the long run :)<br />
.-= Jenna&#8217;s most recent blog post: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThatWife/~3/akG4S3O6iTU/" rel="nofollow">Our Heavenly Family</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: octavian</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/2009/10/08/portrait-vs-kit-which-lens-is-better-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4615</link>
		<dc:creator>octavian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/?p=4868#comment-4615</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really see that much difference in quality between kit and other lenses. Of course it is darker. That&#039;s obvious as aperture is less. And there is also less bokeh, but cmon bokeh doesn&#039;t add any &quot;quality&quot;.
.-= octavian&#039;s most recent blog post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tavi.ws/?p=5526&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Тлен&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really see that much difference in quality between kit and other lenses. Of course it is darker. That&#8217;s obvious as aperture is less. And there is also less bokeh, but cmon bokeh doesn&#8217;t add any &#8220;quality&#8221;.<br />
.-= octavian&#8217;s most recent blog post: <a href="http://tavi.ws/?p=5526" rel="nofollow">Тлен</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adie</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/2009/10/08/portrait-vs-kit-which-lens-is-better-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4098</link>
		<dc:creator>adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/?p=4868#comment-4098</guid>
		<description>A very good explanations, based on experience??? I&#039;ll think about buy low in body and up in lenses.. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good explanations, based on experience??? I&#8217;ll think about buy low in body and up in lenses.. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charmel</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/2009/10/08/portrait-vs-kit-which-lens-is-better-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>Charmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/?p=4868#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>I have been reading your blog for a few hours now and I LOVE the way you explain photography!  I am in the market for a dSLR and will absolutely use all I have learned from you when making my big purchase.  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading your blog for a few hours now and I LOVE the way you explain photography!  I am in the market for a dSLR and will absolutely use all I have learned from you when making my big purchase.  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/2009/10/08/portrait-vs-kit-which-lens-is-better-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elizabethannedesigns.com/living/?p=4868#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>I sure wish this post had been around six months ago before I purchased my kit set! Thanks for the insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure wish this post had been around six months ago before I purchased my kit set! Thanks for the insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

